Cases 41 - 50 of 179
Morgan v. Federal Correctional Complex - Coleman
as 6:2020cv02214
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Complex - Coleman
Plaintiff:
Daniel Latrevors Morgan and Daniel Latrevors Morgan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donnell Dyer-El v. US
as 20-7147
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK BOLSTER, Acting Warden, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, Medium, Petersburg, VA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONNELL M. DYER
McGriff v. United States of America
as 20-1951
Respondent:
Warden of Florence Federal Correction Complex and United States of America
Petitioner:
Kenneth McGriff
Nichols v. Forrest City Federal Corrections Complex
as 2:2020cv00109
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Alan Nichols
Defendant:
Forrest City Federal Corrections Complex and Dewayne Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
David Gray v. Calvin Johnson, Warden
as 20-30221
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID FURTADO GRAY, also known as Dawud Ibn Furtado
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON, WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX POLLOCK
Brenson Stovall v. Calvin Johnson, Warden
as 19-31061
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON, WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX POLLOCK
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRENSON STOVALL
Lovelle Lang v. Calvin Johnson, Warden
as 19-31063
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON, WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX POLLOCK
Petitioner / Appellant:
LOVELLE LANG
Olden Terry, III v. Marcus Martin, Warden
as 20-60068
Respondent / Appellee:
MARCUS MARTIN, Warden, Federal Correctional Complex (Low), Yazoo City, Mississippi
Petitioner / Appellant:
OLDEN TERRY, III
David Williams v. Calvin Johnson, Warden
as 19-31012
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON, WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX POLLOCK
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID WILLIAMS
Carroll v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2019cv00604
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Complex Coleman-Medium, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Medical Department at FCC Coleman-Medium
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
