Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 258
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. KOPPEL, M.D. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv03413
Defendant: BRIAN BEAGIN, D.C., CLIFTON PAIN AND REHAB LLC, VINCENT SARACENO, D.C. and others
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO CASUALTY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Frazier v. Geico Casualty Company
as 4:2022cv00636
Plaintiff: Crystal Frazier
Defendant: Geico Casualty CO., Geico Casualty Company and Floyd Lamont Hampton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Type: Contract Insurance
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. EAST COAST SPINE, JOINT AND SPORTS MEDICINE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv19408
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant: EAST COAST SPINE, JOINT AND SPORTS MEDICINE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION d/b/a THE SPINE AND SPORTS HEALTH CENTER, ALEXANDER VISCO, M.D., MICHAEL KELLY, D.C. and others
Cross Claimant: RON BEN-MEIR
Cross Defendant: JOHN DE HOYOS, TORAL DOSHI and EAST COAST SPINE, JOINT AND SPORTS MEDICINE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. David Kalin, M.D. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2021cv02556
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Co., Geico Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: David Kalin, M.D., Himes Walk In Clinic L.L.C., Maikel Cabrera L.M.T. and others
Not Classified By Court: Gregory P. Holder and Norman Gerstein
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Gilberto Seco, M.D. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv24155
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Co., Geico Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Gilberto Seco, M.D., Med-Union Medical Center, Inc., Jorge A. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. CLINICA DE ACUPUNTURA Y SALUD NATURAL, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02639
Defendant: JULIA IOFFE, M.D., CLINICA DE ACUPUNTURA Y SALUD NATURAL, LLC doing business as ACUPUNCTURE & CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC OF N.J., TAE YOUNG HONG, D.C., L.AC. and others
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cross Defendant: CLINICA DE ACUPUNTURA Y SALUD NATURAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Northern Physical Therapy, Chiropractic, & Acupuncture, PLLC et al
as 1:2022cv00568
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Co., GEICO Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Northern Physical Therapy, Chiropractic, & Acupuncture, PLLC, Sangwoo Mah, D.C., Seung-Hyuk Choi, P.T. and others
Not Classified By Court: David P Horowitz
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO et al v. MIAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00233
Defendant: ATA CHAUDHRY, SHAHID MIAN, SURGERY CENTER OF ORADELL, LLC and others
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Fort et al v. Golden Stones L P et al
as 5:2022cv01726
Plaintiff: Solomon D Fort and Edwina Fort
Defendant: Golden Stones, LP, Geico Casualty Co and Enrique Ibarra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Dufraine v. Shepard et al
as 1:2022cv00099
Plaintiff: Naomi N. Dufraine
Defendant: Lonnie Shepard, Silver Trucking, LLC, FedEx Freight Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?