Cases 41 - 50 of 1,552
Malvo v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Lee Malvo
Defendant:
Director Harold Clarke, Warden Rick White, Major C. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galloway v. Clarke et al
as 1:2023cv00991
Plaintiff:
Sean C. Galloway
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Cabell and Darden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Watson v. Clarke
as 1:2023cv00995
Petitioner:
Edward Watson
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00456
Petitioner:
Terell Moore
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johns v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Lameek Shalam Johns
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold Clarke, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Cagle v. Cundiff et al
as 3:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Tenisha Cagle
Defendant:
Officer Cundiff, Officer Johnson, Thomas Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniels v. Clarke
as 3:2023cv00446
Petitioner:
Charncey Laquinn Daniels
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Clarke et al
as 1:2023cv00916
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Hill
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Mr. Tatum, Mr. Puryear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Saunders v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00416
Petitioner:
Jamal Kemo Saunders and Forever Al-Mani Hamilton
Respondent:
Director Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
