Cases 41 - 50 of 119
Flick v. Miller et al
as 1:2019cv01811
Defendant:
Mark Garman, Richard Ellers, Heather Haldeman and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Flick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdulkarim Dahir v. Lori Swanson, et al
as 19-3176
Defendant / Appellee:
Adam Kohnstamm, Minnesota Assistant Attorney General, Alexandria Kieley, (Mountain) Former Investigator with Minnesota Attorney General, Scott Haldeman, Former Minnesota Assistant Attorney General, in individual capacity and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abdulkarim Mohamed Dahir
Scalia v. Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv09302
Defendant:
Gary D Forsee, Lowell L Bryan, DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Scalia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
United States of America v. Pac. Coast Plumb. Supply Assn et al
as 2:2019mc00084
Defendant:
F. A. Nitchey, A. H. Busch Co., A. R. Gardner and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00441
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Hooley et al v. Seer Stone Global et al
as 2:2019cv00012
Defendant:
Sinai Capital, Inc., Quant Club, Inc., Seer Stone Global and others
Plaintiff:
Hooley Solutions, LLC, Steven Hooley, International Markets Live, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
NOT USED
as 2:2019cv00007
Defendant:
Sinai Capital, Inc., Hooley Holdings, Steven Hooley and others
Plaintiff:
International Markets Live, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2018cv02352
Defendant:
Rex Wertz, Sipple, James Barnackle and others
Plaintiff:
Marcellus A Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dahir v. Swanson et al
as 0:2018cv02980
Defendant:
Alexandria Kieley (Mountain), Kirsi Poupore, Christopher J. Florey and others
Plaintiff:
Abdulkarim M. Dahir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
