Cases 41 - 50 of 101
Deal v. Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2021cv00181
Defendant:
Jacqueline Bunn, Brian Owens, Terry E. Bernard and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Fitzgerald Deal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOSAL et al v. DIVERSIFIED PLASTICS INC
as 3:2020cv00122
Plaintiff:
Michael Nosal and Joan Herring
Defendant:
Diversified Plastics, Inc. and DIVERSIFIED PLASTICS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Madison v. Barnard et al
as 1:2020cv03923
Defendant:
Jacqueline Bunn, Brian Owens, James W. Mills and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Madison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. GREEN et al
as 5:2020cv00371
Defendant:
DAVID HERRING, MICHAEL DETARDO, OFFICER GREEN and others
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERRING v. CVB COLLECTIONS ALBANY INC
as 1:2020cv00133
Defendant:
CVB COLLECTIONS ALBANY INC doing business as CVB SERVICE
Plaintiff:
MARIAN HERRING
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Herring v. Allconnect, Inc.
as 1:2020cv02950
Plaintiff:
Naomi Herring
Defendant:
Allconnect, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
EL v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 5:2020cv00231
Plaintiff:
TEZ BEN EL
Defendant:
ROBYN CRITTENDEN, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and ROBYN CRITTENDEN In her private Capacity doing business as COMMISSIONER OF THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. State Board of Pardons & Paroles et al
as 1:2020cv01696
Respondent:
State Board of Pardons & Paroles, Jacquline Bunn, Esq,, United States District Court, Georgia and others
Petitioner:
Randy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00829
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith v. Smith et al
as 1:2020cv00518
Defendant:
Instagram, Kyle ? (App Official From Ohio), App and others
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Prayton Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
