Cases 41 - 50 of 145
FLORES et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv06295
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF CARMEN J. FLORES and RENE FLORES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Felipe Diaz v. T. Lindquist, et al
as 20-55516
Defendant / Appellee:
C. SPENCER, C.O.; HCA - D1 Escort 3, individual and official capacity, D. HENRY, C.O.; D1 - floor 2 - EOP, individual and official capacity, E. ENGLAND, C.O.; D1 - ESCRT-2, individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELIPE DIAZ
FLORES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv67033
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HECTOR J FLORES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flores et al v. USA Truck Inc et al
as 1:2020cv00127
Defendant:
Robert Iovanne and USA Truck Inc
Plaintiff:
Demetrio J Flores and Liza Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flores et al v. Schwartz et al
as 3:2020cv00430
Defendant:
Luther Schwartz, Justin Morgan, Robin May and others
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Flores and Wendi D. Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Deshan Mabry v. McVay et al
as 2:2020cv00394
Respondent:
Purdy, L. Newton, John Doe #1 and others
Petitioner:
Kevin Deshan Mabry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Deshan Mabry v. L. Newton et al
as 2:2019cv10445
Defendant:
Purdy, L. Newton, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Deshan Mabry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mabry v. McVay et al
as 3:2019cv02361
Defendant:
Purdy, L. Newton, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Deshan Mabry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Adams v. Manglicmot et al
as 4:2019cv07952
Defendant:
Chinyere Anudokem, Robert Deluna, R. Binuluna and others
Plaintiff:
Herron A. Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mabry v. Newton et al
as 3:2019cv02194
Defendant:
Purdy, L. Newton, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Deshan Mabry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
