Cases 41 - 50 of 637
Crawford v. Zamora et al
as 3:2022cv00354
Defendant:
Carolina Juarez, Andrea Zamora, Angelica Arreola and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly M. Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Crawford v. Zamora et al
as 2:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Kelly M. Crawford
Defendant:
Andrea Zamora, Angelica Arreola, Arturo Velarde Romo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Viola et al v. The City of Morgantown
as 1:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Brandon Viola, Matthew Solomon, Chad Reyes and others
Counter Defendant:
Kenneth Murphey, Joshua Frantz, Austin Bittner and others
Defendant:
The City of Morgantown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
James Fudge v. Bret Bennett, et al
as 22-35723
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES CHARLES FUDGE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRET BENNETT, NANCY ARMSTRONG, JEREMY BEAUMONT and others
Scott v. United States Postal Service
as 5:2022cv01001
Petitioner:
Joshua J. Scott
Respondent:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
James Fudge v. Bret Bennett, et al
as 22-35708
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES CHARLES FUDGE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRET BENNETT, NANCY ARMSTRONG, JEREMY BEAUMONT and others
Scott v. United States Postal Service
as 5:2022cv01000
Petitioner:
Joshua J. Scott
Respondent:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2316
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ferrara v. The City of Kyle et al
as 5:2022cv00741
Plaintiff:
John David Ferrara
Defendant:
The City of Kyle, J. Scott Sellers and Jeffery Blake Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2144
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
