Cases 41 - 50 of 319,292
Smith v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Antonio Smith
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Keritsis v. Luciano et al
as 1:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
George Keritsis
Defendant:
Juan R. Luciano, Michael S. Burke, Theodore Colbert, III and others
Santiago v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03249
Plaintiff:
Edwin Santiago
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley and Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Alexander v. Herrera Solutions, INC et al
as 5:2024cv06056
Plaintiff:
Quincey J. Alexander
Defendant:
Herrera Solutions, INC and Nick Herrera
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ulitto v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03039
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ulitto
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kreikemeir v. Berger et al
as 4:2024cv02336
Plaintiff:
Dillon Kreikemeir
Defendant:
William J. Berger, Rahman D'Argenio, Michael C. Morgan and others
Andreano v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04393
Plaintiff:
Michael Andreano
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility Program Office et al
as 5:2024cv03721
Plaintiff:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Defendant:
Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility Program Office, S. Huss, A. Coudillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
