Cases 41 - 50 of 1,743
Demos v. Bayer, et al.
as 24-828
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Defendant:
DANIEL BAYER, Shift Lt, WSP, JENNIFER ADAMS, P.R.E.A. Liason, WSP, M. MORENO, Major Hearings Officer, WSP and others
Demos, John Robert v. Trump
as 9:2024cv80169
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. JP Morgan Chase, N.A. et al
as 4:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
John Robert Hunter, Jr
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase, N.A. and Freddie Mac
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Demos v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00203
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America and Donald J Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. State of Washington
as 24-676
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Demos v. Inslee, et al.
as 24-680
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHERYL STRANGE, ROBERT FERGUSON, BRAD BOWMAN and others
Martin v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
John Robert Martin, Jr.
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kitchell v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
John Robert Kitchell
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martin v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
John Robert Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leroy Wells v. John Roberts, et al
as 24-5021
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Defendant:
John Roberts, Chief Justice United States Supreme Court, D.S.G., U.S.D.C.D. Or. Pendleton Division; Clerk, John Does, U.S.D.C.D. Or. Pendleton Division; Clerks and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
