Cases 41 - 50 of 389
Rodriguez v. Geovera Specialty Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv23480
Plaintiff:
Juan Rodriguez
Defendant:
Geovera Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22996
Plaintiff:
JUAN RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
US v. Rodriguez
as 22-1807
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Mula, a/k/a Mula Monopoly
Rodriguez v. Medline Industries, LP
as 1:2022cv03089
Defendant:
Medline Industries, LP and Medline Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Juan Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16406
Plaintiff:
JOSE JUAN RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Angel Estrada et al v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2022cv00990
Plaintiff:
Angela Estrada, Manuel Rodriguez, Juan Rodriguez, III and others
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez-Hernandez v. Garland
as 22-60402
Petitioner:
Juan Rodriguez-Hernandez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Gutierrez et al v. Gemilang Solutions, LLC et al
as 6:2022cv00816
Plaintiff:
Humberto Gutierrez and Gloria E. Diaz
Defendant:
Gemilang Solutions, LLC, Hayde Rodriguez and Juan Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Angel Estrada et al v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 2:2022cv04048
Plaintiff:
Angela Estrada, Manuel Rodriguez, Juan Rodriguez, III and others
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
