Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 660
JARA v. U.S. CAPITOL POLICE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv02754
Plaintiff: ISAI JARA
Defendant: U.S. CAPITOL POLICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
USA v. Edwin Jara
as 22-12928
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: EDWIN LUNA JARA
Patrick Lockhart v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 22-1865
Plaintiff / Appellant: PATRICK LOCKHART, individually and as parent and next friend of B.L. and K.L., K.L. and B.L.
Defendant / Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STEPHEN THOMAS DESCANO, JR., Commonwealth's Attorney, RYAN BREDEMEIER and others
Jara v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02815
Plaintiff: Sassafra Ley Jara
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Womens Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02335
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
R. White v. USDC-CALA
as 22-70078
Not Classified By Court: In re: R. WHITE, JACQUELINE SEABROOKS, GLEAM DAVIS and others
Petitioner: R. WHITE
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Arroyave v. Garland
as 22-416
Petitioner: ALEJANDRO JARA ARROYAVE
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02195
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
R. White v. Jacqueline Seabrooks, et al
as 2:2021cv08528
Plaintiff: R. White
Defendant: Jacqueline Seabrooks, Gleam Davis, Philip Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jara-Jara v. Garland
as 21-6553
Petitioner: JUAN DIEGO JARA-JARA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?