Cases 41 - 50 of 120
Rodriguez-Madera v. Borrero-Rivera et al
as 3:2016cv02866
Plaintiff:
Alexander Rodriguez-Madera
Defendant:
Lefty Borrero-Rivera, Jose Negron-Fernandez, Jose Uriel Zayas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Fernandez-Madrid v. Ngung
as 4:2016cv03125
Plaintiff:
Jose Refugio Fernandez-Madrid
Defendant:
FNU Ngung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04325
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fernandez-Madrid v. Ngung
as 1:2016cv00217
Plaintiff:
Jose Refugio Fernandez-Madrid
Defendant:
FNU Ngung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernandez v. Wernecke et al
as 2:2016cv02013
Plaintiff:
Jose I. Fernandez
Defendant:
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Natalie Ann Wernecke, md
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Tawe v. Salazar et al
as 2:2016cv00081
Plaintiff:
Richard N Tawe
Defendant:
Juan Salazar, Jr., David M Rios, Jose H Fernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charlemagne et al v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2016cv20172
Plaintiff:
Jean-Elie Uriel Charlemagne and Emmanuel Michael Charlemagne
Defendant:
State of Florida, Miami-Dade Corrections, Turner Guilford Knight Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aguilar-Zavala et al v. Riverbell, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv14001
Plaintiff:
Rey David Aguilar-Zavala , Luis Alfredo Canseco-Pensina , Juan Carlos Carabeo-Lopez and others
Defendant:
Riverbell, Inc. and Harmon Fruit Contracting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Fernandez v. Fernandez et al
as 1:2015cv01182
Plaintiff:
Dominic George Fernandez
Defendant:
Mary Ann P. Fernandez, Mario George Fernandez, Stacy A Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernandez v. Frauenhein
as 3:2015cv05576
Petitioner:
Jose Manuel Fernandez
Respondent:
S. Frauenhein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
