Cases 41 - 50 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv10397
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MCDONALD v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 3:2017cv00266
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MCDONALD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS , VENDOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC. , VENDOR CONNECT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
McDonald v. Seterus, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00938
Plaintiff:
Joseph McDonald
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
McDonald v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv00217
Plaintiff:
Laurence Joseph McDonald
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested_party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
McDonald v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2016cv00082
Plaintiff:
Laurence Joseph McDonald
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
USA v. Joseph McDonald
as 15-14532
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH MCDONALD
Hinterberger et al v. Catholic Health System, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00380
Plaintiff:
Marcia Carroll, Gail Hinterberger, Beverly Weisbecker and others
Defendant:
Catholic Health East, Catholic Health System Continuing Care Foundation, Catholic Health System Program of All-Inclusive Care For The Elderly, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Silvestri v. Smith et al
as 1:2014cv13137
Plaintiff:
Mark Silvestri
Defendant:
James Smith, Patrick Kelly, George Kelsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Myers v. McDonald et al
as 1:2014cv13115
Plaintiff:
Stephan V. Myers
Defendant:
Joseph McDonald, Jeanne Lotviante, Dr. Rencricca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv04593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
