Cases 41 - 50 of 793
Hickman v. Jones
as 5:2020cv01027
Defendant:
Julie Jones
Plaintiff:
John Hickman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Herndon v. Corizon of Florida, LLC. et al
as 3:2020cv00616
Defendant:
Centurion of Florida, LLC, Julie Jones, Mark S. Inch and others
Plaintiff:
James Herndon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D'Amico v. Inch et al
as 3:2020cv00622
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Robert Smith, Joseph Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Steven F. D'Amico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANIELS v. CLOUD et al
as 4:2020cv00246
Defendant:
ARVEL COPELAND, STATE OF FLORIDA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RELATIONS COMMISSION, OTHER DEFENDANTS and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN JOSEPH DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MYLES v JOCELYN, et al
as 1:2020cv00094
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER TROY MYLES
Defendant:
WHATLY, MICHAEL A LIPE, LOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00203
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Lowe v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00237
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Centurion of Florida, LLC., Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Danny L Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nyka O'Connor v. Julie Jones, et al
as 20-11456
Defendant / Appellee:
T. COHENS, Food Service Staff (2013-2018): Individual & Official Capacity, S. JOHNSON, Nurse; Individual & Official Capacit, JULIE JONES, Former Secretary FDOC: Individual Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NYKA TASSIANT O'CONNOR
Leo Cono v. William Barr et al
as 2:2020cv02656
Plaintiff:
Leo Cono and Cono
Defendant:
Kathy Moralez, Madelyne Bloom, John Desheplo and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Thomas v. Doe et al
as 3:2020cv00310
Defendant:
F.D.O.C. Secretary Julie Jones, The Warden John Doe, C/O John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander F. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
