Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Griffin v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 0:2019cv62704
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff:
Theodore Keith Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pollard v. Campbell et al
as 3:2019cv02992
Defendant:
James C. Campbell and Bryan Keith Griffin
Plaintiff:
Parrish Rayquan Pollard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Morant v. Dodson et al
as 3:2019cv02930
Defendant:
Deputy Clerk James C. Campbell, Ronald L. Dodson, Jr., Bonds Man Vanessa Moyer and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Rodriguez Morant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Gregg-Wilson v. Sumter County, S.C. et al
as 3:2019cv00987
Defendant:
Bryan Keith Griffin, Sumter County Sheriff Department, Sumter County, S.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael P.L. Gregg-Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Griffin v. State of Florida et al
as 0:2019cv60877
Defendant:
Officer Thomas McGuire, State of Florida, Officer Paul Scheel and others
Plaintiff:
Theodore Keith Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Griffin v. Dittmann
as 2:2017cv01508
Petitioner:
Keith Griffin, Jr
Respondent:
Michael Dittmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Griffin v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2017cv00077
Plaintiff:
Theodore Keith Griffin
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Delta Airlines, TSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theodore Griffin v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 15-14420
Petitioner - Appellant:
THEODORE KEITH GRIFFIN
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Griffin v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2015cv60603
Plaintiff:
Theodore Keith Griffin
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections , Florida Attorney General and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
