Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Barker v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2010cv02069
Plaintiff:
Sheila M. Barker
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Barker Jr. v. Astrue
as 4:2010cv00446
Plaintiff:
Edwin M. Barker Jr.
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Barker v. USA
as 6:2010cv03027
Respondent:
USA
Movant:
Christopher M. Barker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Diamond Foods, Inc. v. Barker
as 1:2009cv07504
Plaintiff:
Diamond Foods, Inc., Diamond Foods, Inc. and Diamond Foods, Inc.
Defendant:
James M. Barker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Corbello et al v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2009cv02199
Plaintiff:
Michael Corbello and Albert Reynolds
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Reville, Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Barker v. V.I.P. Adjustment Bureau Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv01243
Plaintiff:
Rose M. Barker
Defendant:
V.I.P. Adjustment Bureau Inc., San Diego Pain and Rehabilitation and Tom Cornetto
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Barker v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv00072
Plaintiff:
Dreena M. Barker
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
EB ASSOCIATES INC, et al v. REX LUMBER LLC, et al
as 5:2009cv00163
Plaintiff:
EB ASSOCIATES INC, EB ASSOCIATES INC, EARL M BARKER and others
Defendant:
REX LUMBER LLC, CHRIS BLAIR and CHRIS CLOUD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Manning v. Gibson et al
as 3:2008cv00900
Petitioner:
Paul Graham Manning
Respondent:
William E. Gibson, Benjamin W. Fann, William M. Locke and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
