Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Greenberg v. Ordonez et al
as 3:2010cv03029
Plaintiff:
Betty Greenberg
Defendant:
Kathy Ordonez, Joel R. Jung, Ugo DeBlasi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kahn v. Ordonez et al
as 3:2010cv02935
Plaintiff:
Alan R. Kahn
Defendant:
Kathy Ordonez, Richard H. Ayers, Jean-Luc Belingard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kahn v. Ordonez et al
as 5:2010cv02935
Plaintiff:
Alan R. Kahn
Defendant:
Kathy Ordonez , Richard H. Ayers, Jean-Luc Belingard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burrell v. Shapiro et al
as 2:2010cv02400
Plaintiff:
Thomas Burrell
Defendant:
Gerald M. Shapiro and Corporation Services Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Brown v. Moll et al
as 3:2009cv05881
Plaintiff:
Michael Brown, Michael Brown, Michael Brown and others
Defendant:
Frederic H. Moll, Steven M. Van Dick, Gary C. Restani and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Amro International, S.A. et al v. Sedona Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv04291
Plaintiff:
Amro International, S.A., Roseworth Group, Ltd., Cambois Finance, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Sedona Corporation, Marco A. Emrich, Laurence L. Osterwise and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-4590
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-4590
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Party - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bias v. Schneider et al
as 1:2008cv02449
Plaintiff:
Vince C. Bias
Defendant:
David C. Schneider, David C. Schneider, Washington Mutual Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
