Cases 41 - 50 of 1,318
McHUGH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv23082
Plaintiff:
MARK ALBERT McHUGH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Withers v. Judge McHugh
as 1:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Tonya Withers
Defendant:
Judge McHugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Withers v. McHugh
as 23-1569
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONYA WITHERS
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN F. MCHUGH
McHugh v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
as 1:2023cv00366
Plaintiff:
James McHugh
Defendant:
Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Billie v. Dubay
as 23-381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Petura Billie, Natural Person, In Propria Persona
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Kevin Dubay, Judge Patty Pittman, Hartford Superior Court Clerk Susan Kenkos and others
MCHUGH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19396
Plaintiff:
JOHN MCHUGH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mattinas v. Portland Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Bertie Mattinas
Defendant:
Portland Police Department, State of Idaho, Rich Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McHugh v. Enzo Biochem, Inc.
as 2:2023cv04326
Plaintiff:
Shana McHugh, Enzo Clinical Labs, Inc. and Lab Corporation of America Holdings
Defendant:
Enzo Biochem, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Withers v. Judge McHugh
as 1:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Tonya Withers
Defendant:
Judge McHugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Austin v. McHugh et al
as 2:2023cv14181
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Austin
Defendant:
Elizabeth Rose McHugh and James Walter McCann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
