Cases 41 - 50 of 303,185
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Howard v. City of Savannah et al
as 4:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Michael Antonio Howard
Defendant:
City of Savannah, State of Georgia, Judge Lousie Abbot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hinton et al v. Gaspar et al
as 4:2024cv11603
Plaintiff:
C'Quan Michael Hinton, Gina Edwards and Dartanion Edwards
Defendant:
Lee Ann Gaspar and Flint, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ortiz v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv03670
Plaintiff:
Michael Ortiz
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Daley v. Bautista et al
as 3:2024cv01066
Plaintiff:
Steve Daley
Defendant:
Michael Bautista, Akeem Bryce, Christopher Sgritta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOGERMAN v. The United States of America
as 0:2024cv61070
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MOGERMAN
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
MOGERMAN v. The United States of America
as 0:2024cv61068
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MOGERMAN
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
