Cases 41 - 50 of 33,939
Pruitt, Brandon D. v. Judge Cabarga et al
as 1:2024cv21860
Plaintiff:
Brandon Demon Pruitt
Defendant:
Judge Cabarga, Office of Public Defender Carlos J. Martinez, Katherine Rundle Fernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Coe v. Martinez-New et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Brenton L Coe
Respondent:
Julia Martinez-New, FNU Cozbi, FNU Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Choose Your Horizon, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02798
Plaintiff:
Karen Martinez
Defendant:
Choose Your Horizon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Martinez-Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-2966
Petitioner:
DANIEL SOLOMAN MARTINEZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gatz v. Fabian et al
as 1:2024cv03805
Plaintiff:
Randy Gatz
Defendant:
Tiffany Fabian, Deorea Sunday, Shantina Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez v. Healy
as 4:2024cv00833
Petitioner:
Henry Ermy Martinez
Respondent:
Warden Ian Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
C. Finley v. Karen Bass et al
as 2:2024cv03894
Plaintiff:
C. Finley
Defendant:
Karen Bass, Eunisses Hernandez, Paul Krekorian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez, Jr. et al v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv11221
Plaintiff:
Manuel Martinez, Jr., Kathleen Martinez, Manny Martinez and others
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC, Onstar, LLC, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc. and others
Schochenmaier v. Gomez et al
as 5:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Ryan Schochenmaier
Defendant:
John Gomez, Jorge Esparza, Juan Galindo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez-Alvarez v. Garland
as 24-1235
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO ANTONIO MARTINEZ-ALVAREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
