Cases 41 - 50 of 403
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MCCUNE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21312
Plaintiff:
EVAN MICHAEL MCCUNE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCune v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Polk County)
as 8:2022cv02123
Petitioner:
Willie David McCune
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mark McCune v. Aldridge Pite LLP, et al
as 22-16204
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK WADE MCCUNE, Debtor
Defendant / Appellee:
ALDRIDGE PITE LLP, JOSEPHINE E. SALMON, WELLS FARGO BANK and others
Mark McCune v. Dianne Kerns
as 22-16203
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK WADE MCCUNE, Debtor
Defendant / Appellee:
DIANNE C. KERNS, Chapter 13 Trustee
Hartzol v. Swing et al
as 4:2022cv04115
Plaintiff:
Charles S. Hartzol, III
Defendant:
J. Swing, Ct. McCune, Major Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS)Iliya v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2022cv01305
Plaintiff:
Dauda Iliya
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Anne Marie Schubert, Scott R. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCune et al v. Zhongyiqun
as 4:2022cv00604
Plaintiff:
Ted McCune, F4PS LLC and Ted (George) McCune
Defendant:
Zhongyiqun
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Mccune v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv03499
Plaintiff:
James Mccune
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
