Cases 41 - 50 of 58
MiCash Inc v NetSpend Corporation
as 2:2012cv00248
Plaintiff:
MiCash Inc
Defendant:
NetSpend Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
TQP Development, LLC v. NetSpend Corporation
as 2:2012cv00065
Plaintiff:
TQP Development LLC
Defendant:
NetSpend Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Manzanares v. Netspend Corporation
as 2:2011cv00344
Plaintiff:
Martin J Manzanares
Defendant:
Netspend Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Integrated Technological Systems, Inc. v. Netspend Corporation
as 2:2011cv01625
Plaintiff:
Integrated Technological Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Netspend Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Alexsam, Inc. v. NetSpend Corporation
as 1:2010cv00837
Counter Defendant:
Alexsam, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alexsam, Inc.
Counter Plaintiff:
NetSpend Corporation
Defendant:
NetSpend Corporation
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Excise Tax
Chiras v. Netspend Corporation
as 4:2010cv40169
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chiras
Defendant:
Netspend Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thompson v. Netspend Corporation et al
as 4:2010cv00082
Plaintiff:
Theodore J Thompson
Defendant:
Netspend Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
CLORINDA BLASSE v. NETSPEND CORPORATION et al
as 1:2009cv06525
Plaintiff:
CLORINDA BLASSE
Defendant:
NETSPEND CORPORATION, INTER NATIONAL BANK, VISA U.S.A., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Actus, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00168
Plaintiff:
Actus, LLC
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., Amdocs, Inc., American Express Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
BAKER v. VISA U.S.A., INC. et al
as 1:2008cv05668
Plaintiff:
FREDERIC J. BAKER
Defendant:
VISA U.S.A., INC., INTER NATIONAL BANK and NETSPEND CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
