Cases 41 - 50 of 792
SMITH v. US POST OFFICE
as 1:2022cv03677
Plaintiff:
GEORGE P. SMITH
Defendant:
US POST OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
O'Dell v. Store Capital Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv09273
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Store Capital Corp., Tawn Kelley, Mary Fedewa and others
Freeman v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv01419
Plaintiff:
Gina Freeman
Defendant:
Brooks P Smith, Jane Doe Smith and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
HICKEY et al v. SMITH et al
as 1:2022cv02343
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH P. HICKEY and LAUREL ULRICH
Defendant:
JOSEPH P. SMITH, JOSEPH J. GRILLO, Richard F. Passarelli and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SMITH v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv01498
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN P. SMITH
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12170
Plaintiff:
LYENELL PERRY SMITH and LYENELL P SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00577
Petitioner:
Stephan P Smith
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith et al v. Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00546
Plaintiff:
Johnny P Smith, Next Level Administrators, LLC and Next Level Administrators LLC
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc., ABC Insurance Company, DEF Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-11449
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cortez-Gomez v. Chicago Strike Force Group 7 et al
as 1:2022cv02803
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Cortez-Gomez
Defendant:
Chicago Strike Force Group 7, Thomas E Spratte, David A Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
