Cases 41 - 50 of 285
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv05797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2016cv01469
Plaintiff:
Laura L Timlick
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA, Residential Credit Solutions, Inc, Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cantley et al v. Ditech Financial LLC et al
as 2:2016cv13341
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC and Residential Credit Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robin B Cantley and Bruce A Cantley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Michael Williams v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 16-16450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOAN, INC., BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Arturo Ramos v. DLI Properties, LLC et al
as 5:2016cv01257
Plaintiff:
Arturo Ramos
Defendant:
DLI Properties, LLC, Recontrust Company Inc, Americas Wholesale Lender and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Giannasca et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2016cv02002
Plaintiff:
Edward V. Giannasca, II and Giannasca Family Farm, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. , Peter Kafouros , Ruth Derewyanko and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Leslie Edward Walker v. DITECH FINANCIAL LLC et al
as 3:2016cv03084
Plaintiff:
Leslie Edward Walker
Defendant:
DITECH FINANCIAL LLC and Residential Credit Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
