Cases 41 - 50 of 88
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv08322
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", The, Shuyi Zhou and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A, Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Family Medical Leave Act of 1993
Damien Sublett v. Alan Brown, et al
as 16-5441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMIEN SUBLETT
Defendant - Appellee:
ALAN BROWN, Warden at Green River Correctional Complex, CASEY FOSTER, Sergeant at Green River Correctional Complex, COURTNEY BRADLEY, Nurse and others
WILLIAMS v. LANIGAN
as 2:2016cv01961
Petitioner:
RICKY WILLIAMS
Respondent:
GARY M. LANIGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Damien Sublett v. Alan Brown, et al
as 16-5408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMIEN SUBLETT
Defendant - Appellee:
ALAN BROWN, Warden at Green River Correctional Complex, CASEY FOSTER, Sergeant at Green River Correctional Complex, CORTNEY BRADLY, Nurse and others
Harold Jackson v. Robert Risner, et al
as 15-6317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD DELONTAY JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT RISNER, Chaplain, ROBERT JENKINS, U.A., ANDREW KELLER, CTO and others
Brown v. Jones-Murrell et al
as 3:2015cv00825
Plaintiff:
Jeanette D. Brown
Defendant:
Martha Jones-Murrell, Venecca Green-Mason, Lakeisha Heidelberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carethers et al v. Funches
as 2:2015cv14016
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Carethers, Arthur Blank, Ricky Williams and others
Defendant:
Funches
Williams v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2015cv03107
Petitioner:
Ricky Williams, Jr
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
