Cases 41 - 50 of 280
Riley v. Jefferson County Board of Education
as 2:2019cv02122
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Riley
Defendant:
Jefferson County Board of Education and Kendell Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad
Riley v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv01070
Defendant:
Sgt. Harvey, Alabama Department of Corrections and Lt. Rogers
Plaintiff:
Kendall L. Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Dunn et al
as 1:2019cv01045
Defendant:
Sergeant Moore, Sergeant Dees, Warden Lightner and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Lane Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00965
Plaintiff:
Timmy Lee Riley
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production Inc and BP America Production Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 in
Foley v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00828
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production Inc and BP America Production Company
Plaintiff:
James Riley Foley
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Riley v. Stewart
as 3:2019cv00332
Petitioner:
David Riley
Respondent:
Warden Cynthia Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Riley v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv01686
Plaintiff:
Marquel D Riley
Defendant:
United States of America and C Remington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Safeway Insurance Company of Alabama, Inc. v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2018cv00351
Defendant:
Angela E. Riley and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Safeway Insurance Company of Alabama, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
K. et al v. Mobile County Board of Education et al
as 1:2018cv00343
Defendant:
Reginald Crenshaw, Superintendent Martha L. Peek, Coach Fred Riley and others
Plaintiff:
Kennesha Q., Mary K., Colby Q. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
