Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Ivery et al v. RMH Franchise Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv01619
Plaintiff:
Chamora Ivery and Noah Siebenaller
Defendant:
RMH Franchise Corp. , RMH Illinois, LLC and RMH Franchise Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hemp Industries Association, et al v. USDEA, et al
as 17-70162
Petitioner:
HEMP INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION, CENTURIA NATURAL FOODS, INC. and RMH HOLDINGS, LLC
Respondent:
U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and CHARLES ROSENBERG, as Acting Administrator, Drug Enforcement Administration
Chrisman v. RMH Franchise Holdings, Inc.
as 5:2016cv06144
Plaintiff:
Marvin Chrisman
Defendant:
RMH Franchise Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Maldonado v. RMH Franchise Corporation
as 7:2016cv00577
Plaintiff:
Carlos Maldonado, Jr.
Defendant:
RMH Franchise Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs v. RMH Concrete & Foundations, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00721
Plaintiff:
Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs
Defendant:
RMH Concrete & Foundations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
RMH Tech LLC et al v. PMC Industries, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01762
Plaintiff:
RMH Tech LLC and Metal Roof Innovations, Ltd.
Defendant:
PMC Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0101
Ray v. RMH Franchise Corporation
as 7:2015cv00391
Plaintiff:
Linda Ann Ray
Defendant:
RMH Franchise Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Applebee's Restaurants LLC et al
as 2:2014cv02241
Plaintiff:
Heidi Johnson
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Ginni Naegle, Troy Lease and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Sherman v. RMH, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv01986
Plaintiff:
Rafael David Sherman
Defendant:
RMH, LLC and Rancho Chrysler Jeep Dodge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
