Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Ortiz-Miranda v. USA
as 3:2012cv01461
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Raul Ortiz-Miranda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ortiz v. USA
as 3:2012cv00304
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Raul Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. Ortiz-Miranda
as 12-1224
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
RAUL ORTIZ-MIRANDA, a/k/a Cano Beeper
Interested Party:
AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES, BANCO DE SANTANDER PUERTO RICO, BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO and others
Neftali Guzman-Garcia v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-70149
Petitioner:
NEFTALI GUZMAN-GARCIA, AKA Nefali Garcia-Ruballo, AKA Nefali Garcia-Rubello, AKA Nefali Guzman Garcia, AKA Neftali Guzman Garcia, AKA Nefali Guzman-Garcia, AKA Raul Ortiz-Sanchez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
US v. Ortiz-Miranda
as 10-2514
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
RAUL ORTIZ-MIRANDA, a/k/a Cano Beeper
Neftali Guzman-Garcia v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-72560
Petitioner:
NEFTALI GUZMAN-GARCIA, AKA Raul Ortiz-Sanchez, AKA Nefali Guzman-Garcia, AKA Nefali Garcia-Rubello, AKA Nefali Guzman Garcia, AKA Neftali Guzman Garcia
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Oquendo-Figueroa v. Municipality of Toa Baja, et al
as 10-1597
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ZEIDY OQUENDO-FIGUEROA
Defendant - Appellee:
MUNICIPALITY OF TOA BAJA, ANIBAL VEGA-BORGES, PEDRO JULIO SANTIAGO-GUZMAN and others
US v. Raul Ortiz
as 10-4177
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAUL ORTIZ
US v. Ortiz-Miranda
as 09-1328
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
RAUL ORTIZ-MIRANDA, a/k/a Cano Beeper
Interested Party:
US PRETRIAL SERVICES, ERNESTO GONZALEZ-MORALES, US PROBATION and others
US v. Ortiz-Miranda
as 09-1327
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
RAUL ORTIZ-MIRANDA, a/k/a Cano Beeper
Interested Party:
US PRETRIAL SERVICES, ERNESTO GONZALEZ-MORALES, US PROBATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
