Cases 41 - 50 of 129
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roadway Express, Inc. v. Parker
as 1:2008cv03255
Plaintiff:
Roadway Express, Inc.
Defendant:
Antoine Monte Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ALEXANDER v. ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 5:2008cv04591
Plaintiff:
DAVID N. ALEXANDER
Defendant:
ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC., ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC., ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC. and others
Cross Claimant:
DENNIS KEITH YETTER
Cross Defendant:
CHIFFON B. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC.
as 2:2008cv04699
Plaintiff:
HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC. and ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC. v. BED, BATH & BEYOND, INC.
as 2:2008cv04412
Plaintiff:
ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC. and ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC.
Defendant:
BED, BATH & BEYOND, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co., Ltd. v. Roadway Express, Inc.
as 1:2008cv04968
Plaintiff:
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co., Ltd., Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co., Ltd. and Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Roadway Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00091
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hines v. Kelly et al
as 3:2008cv00505
Plaintiff:
Donald Hines
Defendant:
David Kelly, David Kelly, David Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
George Grimes v. Roadway Express, Inc.
as 08-2665
Plaintiff - Appellee:
George Grimes
Defendant - Appellant:
Roadway Express, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
