Cases 41 - 50 of 3,862
Wright v. Harpoon Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Matthew Wright
Defendant:
Harpoon Therapeutics, Inc., Joseph S. Bailes, Mark Chin and others
Rogers v. County of Sacramento, et al.
as 24-738
Plaintiff:
KIM EDWARD ROGERS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, KEATON RILEY, Chief of State to Patrick Kennedy, JIM COOPER, Sacramento Sheriff and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
American Express Company v. Oliver
as 24-317
Petitioner:
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY and AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC.
Respondent:
ANTHONY OLIVER, TERRY GAYLE QUINTON, SHAWN O'KEEFE and others
Keo v. Coutts, et al.
as 24-671
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHANHT REATREY KEO
Defendant / Appellee:
MELISSA ROBBINS COUTTS, FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION and CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Mistry v. Harpoon Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00721
Plaintiff:
Sapna Mistry
Defendant:
Harpoon Therapeutics, Inc., Joseph S. Bailes, Mark Chin and others
Bayse v. Ward et al
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Robbin Amanda Bayse and Robert Bayse
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Sharon Lewis, Jauel Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fair Housing Justice Center, Inc. v. Beechwood Merrick LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00858
Plaintiff:
Fair Housing Justice Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Beechwood Merrick LLC, 725 Merrick LLC, 737 Merrick LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
(PS) Rogers v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Kim Edward Rogers
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Keaton Riley, Jim Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
