Cases 41 - 50 of 95
SHELTON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv01526
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JANICE SHELTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHELTON v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv00817
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
JESSE SHELTON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHELTON v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv00818
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
JESSE SHELTON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHELTON v. ARBOR HOMES LLC
as 1:2017cv00120
Defendant:
ARBOR HOMES LLC
Plaintiff:
BETHANY SHELTON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ADDISON, JR. v. COOK INCORPORATED, ET AL
as 1:2016cv03522
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SHELTON ADDISON, JR
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED and COOK MEDICAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHELTON v. GENERAL CABLE INDUSTRIES INC.
as 1:2016cv02531
Defendant:
GENERAL CABLE INDUSTRIES INC.
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SHELTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MANCINI et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2016cv02048
Plaintiff:
K. C. and MARA MANCINI
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, DOES 1-50, DEBRA DOTSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HICKINGBOTTOM v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2016cv01878
Defendant:
. BECKER, KEITH BUTTS, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DEWAYNE HICKINGBOTTOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BONNER v. LOOP et al
as 4:2016cv00126
Defendant:
BADGER, BANIT, DANA BISHON and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY LEE BONNER, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHELTON v. USA
as 2:2016cv00259
Petitioner:
BRADLEY S. SHELTON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
