Cases 41 - 50 of 628
Paul Speer v. Staci Ibarra, et al
as 23-99003
Petitioner / Appellant:
PAUL BRADLEY SPEER
Respondent / Appellee:
STACI IBARRA, Warden, Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex and RYAN THORNELL, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections
Resch v. Bracken et al
as 2:2023cv10406
Plaintiff:
Brandon Marcus Resch
Defendant:
Katharine Bracken, Cody Crites and Speer
Speer v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Sheri Speer
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
In RE: Beyond Meat, Inc., Protein Content Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 1:2023cv00669
In Re:
Beyond Meat, Inc., Protein Content Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
Plaintiff:
Angelique Roberts, Hannah Offutt, Dylan Rushing and others
Defendant:
Beyond Meat, Inc.
SPEER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04033
Plaintiff:
Herbert L Speer
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia et al v. Beyond Meat, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Garcia, Erica Nichols Cook and Jennifer Speer
Defendant:
Beyond Meat, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Arlan v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Speer Arlan
Defendant:
Tom Maddox, Mike Olsen and Sabine Co. Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPEER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
GARRISON SPEER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
