Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Harrell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 3:2010cv00988
Plaintiff:
Pamela T. Harrell
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hulen Harrell v. D. Sisto, et al
as 10-16438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HULEN T. HARRELL
Defendant - Appellee:
D. K. SISTO, R. W. CAPPELL, WHITE and others
Peter Harrell v. Southern Oregon University, et al
as 10-35549
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER T. HARRELL
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTHERN OREGON UNIVERSITY, MARY CULLINAN, CASEY CLITHERO and others
Peter Harrell v. Costco, et al
as 10-35068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER T. HARRELL
Defendant - Appellee:
COSTCO, JAY MOSCATELLI, BOB FROSCHAUER and others
Peter Harrell v. Southern Oregon University, et al
as 09-35992
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER T. HARRELL
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTHERN OREGON UNIVERSITY, MARY CULLINAN, CASEY CLITHERO and others
Harrell v. Sisto et al
as 2:2009cv01841
Plaintiff:
Hulen T Harrell
Defendant:
D.K. Sisto, R.W. Cappell, White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Kennedy v. L. Wade
as 09-1699
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD KENNEDY
Defendant - Appellee:
L. BRUCE WADE, Judge, District Court of Maryland for Wicomico County, ROBERT M. BELL, Chief Judge, Court of Appeals for the State of Maryland, SALLY D. ADKINS, Judge, Court of Appeals for the State of Maryland and others
Kennedy v. Wade et al
as 1:2009cv01433
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Kennedy
Defendant:
L. Bruce Wade, Robert M. Bell, Sally D. Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hulen Harrell v. Don Taylor, et al
as 09-15059
Petitioner - Appellant:
HULEN T. HARRELL
Respondent - Appellee:
DON TAYLOR, IRONWOOD STATE PRISON and DIANE BUTLER
Michael Broadnax v. T Harrell
as 08-8203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BROADNAX
Defendant - Appellee:
T HARRELL, Corporal, PARRIS, Ms., Corporal, MITCHELL, Mr., Deputy and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
