Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Johnson v. Rouse et al
as 6:2010cv06112
Defendant:
J. Eastwood, T. Hicks, Mark Nooth and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Henry Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Rouse et al
as 3:2010cv06112
Defendant:
J. Eastwood, T. Hicks, Mark Nooth and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Henry Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01052
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010at00554
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Dobson et al v. Vail et al
as 3:2010cv05233
Plaintiff:
Justin Dobson, George T Hicks, Roger M Hotrum and others
Defendant:
Eldon Vail , Maggie Miller-Stout , Robert Herzog and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brewis v. Williams et al
as 6:2009cv01026
Plaintiff:
Jorey Lee Brewis
Defendant:
Max Williams, Mitch Morrow, Steve Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Person v. State Accident Insurance Fund, Corp. et al
as 1:2003cv01046
Defendant:
c/o Mr. Basford, Lieut. Ms. Bassett, Candace Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark Porter v. Jean Hill, et al
as 09-35524
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK DEWAYNE PORTER
Defendant - Appellee:
JEAN HILL, J. MILLER, BILL DOMAN and others
Hicks v. United States
as 1:2009cv00569
Petitioner:
Darius T. Hicks
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert King, Jr. v. Joe Capps, et al
as 09-35304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT HADEN KING, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE E. CAPPS, Inspector III, RON MYERS, Hearings Officer, WADE SCROGHAM, Hearings Administrator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
