Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Biggins v. Danberg et al
as 1:2009cv00862
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
C. Danberg, T. Carroll, R. Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nickerson v. Mooneyham et al
as 7:2009cv00082
Plaintiff:
Cedric Nickerson
Defendant:
J Mooneyham, Tommy Norwood, D Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry T. Carroll v. Owens-illinois, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-78088
Defendant:
Owens-illinois, Inc
Plaintiff:
Henry T. Carroll
Nickerson v. Crites, et al
as 08-40827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC NICKERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD CRITES, McConnell Unit, J MOONEYHAM, Thomas Havins State Jail, Brownwood, TX, STATE CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE, TDCJ Huntsville, TX and others
CARROLL v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv78088
Plaintiff:
HENRY T. CARROLL
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., GARLOCK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Nickerson v. Crites et al
as 2:2008cv00122
Plaintiff:
Cedric Nickerson
Defendant:
Richard Crites, J Mooneyham, STATE CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dixon v. Fischer et al
as 1:2008cv01678
Plaintiff:
Echo Westley Dixon
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, William Lape, D. Martuscello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stuart Tompkins v. T. Carroll
as 08-6133
Petitioner - Appellant:
STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS
Respondent - Appellee:
T. CARROLL
ACOSTA et al v. ARCO CHEMICAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv73740
Plaintiff:
JOSE F ACOSTA, JOSE L ALANIZ, JUAN ANTONIO ALONZO and others
Defendant:
ARCO CHEMICAL COMPANY, ARCO CHEMICAL COMPANY and ARCO CHEMICAL CO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Dixon v. Fischer et al
as 9:2007cv01157
Plaintiff:
Echo Dixon
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, William Lape, D. Martuscello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
