Cases 41 - 50 of 113
WHITNEY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00299
Defendant:
ALEX AZAR, DAVID BERNHARDT, KIRK FRANCIS and others
Plaintiff:
REBECCA WHITNEY and DUSTIN WHITNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FERENCEI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv00288
Plaintiff:
MILAN FERENCEI and JENNIFER GOSETTI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $59,000 IN US CURRENCY et al
as 2:2019cv00281
Defendant:
$59,000 IN US CURRENCY, 1966 CHEVROLET MALIBU COUPE SS 396 and 2018 GMC SIERRA DENALI
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PURVIS HOME IMPROVEMENT CO INC
as 2:2019cv00225
Defendant:
PURVIS HOME IMPROVEMENT CO INC
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
HORNOF et al v. WALLER et al
as 2:2019cv00198
Defendant:
JON D LAVALLEE, RICHARD UDELL, MICHAEL A FAZIO and others
Plaintiff:
JAROSLAV HORNOF, DAMIR KORDIC and LUKAS ZAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FOGG-INMAN v. FISTER, MD et al
as 1:2019cv00197
Plaintiff:
JOANN L FOGG-INMAN
Defendant:
JEFFREY FISTER, MD, PENOBSCOT COMMUNITY DENTAL CENTER and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GLOBAL PARTNERS LP et al
as 2:2019cv00122
Defendant:
GLOBAL PARTNERS LP, GLOBAL COMPANIES LLC and CHELSEA SANDWICH LLC
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
PARKER et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv00091
Plaintiff:
LUCIOUS PARKER, JR and NICOLE PARKER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
WILLETTE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv00090
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA J WILLETTE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NEUBERT
as 2:2019cv00089
Defendant:
KEITH A NEUBERT
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
