Cases 41 - 50 of 3,841
PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (USPS)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. USA, et al
as 24-5077
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant:
United States of America, (i.e. Federal Judges), Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director Administration FBOP Grand Prairie Texas Designation Center and others
Glafiro Gonzalez v. Federal Bureau of Prison et al
as 2:2024cv01944
Plaintiff:
Glafiro Gonzalez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prison, Warden USP Lompoc, Assistant Warden USP Lompoc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schaefer v. Warden, Coleman USP
as 5:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Jason Paul Schaefer
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Eric Krieg v. Warden, USP McCreary
as 24-5312
Petitioner:
ERIC KRIEG
Respondent:
WARDEN, USP MCCREARY
Gorbey v. Warden
as 24-2155
Petitioner:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY and Michael Steven Owl Feather-Gorbey
Respondent:
WARDEN, USP Coleman 1
Gorbey v. Sickle, et al.
as 24-2145
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY and Michael Steven Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
SICKLE, Associate Warden, USP Victorville Cal., GORE, Mr., First Name Unknown, Captain USP Victorville, Cal., JOHN DOE, SIS Staff, USP Victorville Cal. and others
Ford v. USP Big Sandy, Medical Director et al
as 7:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Samuel B. Ford
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy, Medical Director, Warden, USP Big Sandy, Albert Bourla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krieg v. Warden, USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
Eric Krieg
Respondent:
Warden, USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
