Cases 41 - 50 of 97,438
Devasko Lewis v. Warden
as 24-11502
Petitioner:
DEVASKO DEWAYNE LEWIS
Respondent:
WARDEN, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Prison
Myers v. Adams
as 6:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Daniel Alonzo Myers
Defendant:
Warden Robert Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Bossier Medium Correctional Center
as 5:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Herman Woods
Defendant:
Warden Bossier Medium Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodard v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024ct03126
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Woodard
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden L.B. Kelly, Safety Supervisor Muscle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Keer v. Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office et al
as 1:2024cv00818
Petitioner:
Timothy Stephen Keer
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Warden of SCI-Quehanna Boot Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Brian Stepp
as 24-3430
Petitioner:
In re: BRIAN T. STEPP
Respondent:
JENNY HILDEBRAND, Warden
In re: Kesean Wilson
as 24-1443
Petitioner:
In re: KESEAN CALVIN WILSON
Respondent:
BRYAN MORRISON, Warden
Marqus Patton v. Taggart Boyd, et al
as 24-2026
Plaintiff:
Marqus Patton
Defendant:
Taggart Boyd, Warden of the Reception and Treatment Center, Michael Hilgers, Nebraska Attorney General and Rob Jeffreys, Director of the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Rickie Tigue, Jr. v. Moses Jackson, et al
as 24-2029
Plaintiff:
Rickie Lynn Tigue, Jr.
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Warden, EARU, Brickey's Max, Johnson, Warden, EARU, Brickey's Max, Allison, Major, EARU, Brickey's Max and others
Azcarate v. Williams, et al.
as 24-3174
Petitioner:
RAY ANTONIO AZCARATE
Respondent:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
