Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Agnew v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 4:2018cv00604
Respondent:
Warden Richardson and Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Norman L Agnew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grenwalt, Rodney v. Richardson et al
as 3:2018cv00581
Defendant:
Jane Doe Sgt., COII Kremsreiter, Warden Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Grenwalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Richardson et al
as 7:2018cv00101
Defendant:
Officer Kundert L, Hartwell M Richardson, Warden Franco and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley Deshawn McCoy
Amicus Curiae:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Berrera et al
as 7:2018cv00061
Plaintiff:
Wesley Deshawn McCoy
Defendant:
Officer Sgt M Berrera, Warden Richardson, Officer Captain Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Grievance Department Officials (All) et al
as 6:2017cv00251
Plaintiff:
George Bay Barnes
Respondent:
Grievance Department Officials (All), Law Library Officials (All), Head Warden Catoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Grievance Department Officials (All) et al
as 2:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
George Bay Barnes
Defendant:
Grievance Department Officials (All), Law Library Officials (All), Head Warden Catoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton v. Richardson
as 1:2015cv02032
Plaintiff:
Bobby Burton, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Richardson
as 1:2015cv02031
Plaintiff:
Bobby Burton, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roger Deal, Sr. v. Warden Richardson
as 15-7319
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN RICHARDSON
Deal v. Richardson
as 5:2014hc02228
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Deal, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
