Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Eagle Transportation, LLC v. Scott et al
as 2:2011cv00096
Plaintiff:
Eagle Transportation, LLC
Defendant:
Willie Scott and Great American Insurance Company
Cross_claimant:
Great American Insurance Company
Cross_defendant:
Willie Scott
Counter_claimant:
Great American Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
Eagle Transportation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Scott et al v. American Standard, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv04575
Defendant:
American Standard, Inc., Ingersoll-Rand Company, Crane Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia . Scott and Willie Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McCormick v. Nelson et al
as 5:2010cv00051
Plaintiff:
Philip McCormick
Defendant:
FNU Nelson, FNU Palte, FNU Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Willie Scott v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-76758
Plaintiff:
Willie Scott
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
SCOTT v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv76758
Plaintiff:
WILLIE SCOTT
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jonathan Riches v. Thomas Christensen
as 08-7796
Appellant:
In re: JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Plaintiff - None:
RICKY LEE HOLLY
Defendant - None:
THOMAS R. CHRISTENSEN, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, WILLIE SCOTT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01376
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01953
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Katekaru v. Scott
as 08-3130
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL D. KATEKARU
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIE SCOTT, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
