Cases 41 - 50 of 321
Delmy Nolasco-Diaz v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1568
Petitioner:
DELMY XIOMARA NOLASCO-DIAZ and A.L.B.N.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Hill v. Sarmiento, et al
as 3:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
Linda Hill
Defendant:
Home State County Mutual Insurance Company, TRINITY GENERAL AGENCY, LLC, WILMER REYES SARMIENTO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1284
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hernandez Parada v. Garland
as 22-1288
Petitioner:
XIOMARA LETICIA HERNANDEZ PARADA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Espinal Gomez v. Garland
as 22-694
Petitioner:
LESLY XIOMARA ESPINAL GOMEZ, MARINA LIZETH CARRANZA ESPINAL and RUTH CLARISSA CARRANZA ESPINAL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Almonte et al v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2022cv02903
Plaintiff:
Pedro Almonte, Heury Almonte, Genaro Almonte and others
Defendant:
The City Of New York,, Detective Pedro Roche, John Does 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sosa et al v. Bed Bath N More Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01308
Plaintiff:
Nelvy Xiomara Sosa, Angel Carreon and Bed Bath n more Inc
Defendant:
Karl Darwish and Albert Shayek
Bidegain et al v. Plazas Vega
as 0:2022cv60338
Plaintiff:
Helena Uran Bidegain, Xiomara Uran and Mairee Uran Bidegain
Defendant:
Luis Alfonso Plazas Vega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Perez Salguero v. CM Enterprises of Rockland Inc et al
as 7:2022cv00411
Plaintiff:
Erodita Xiomara Perez, Erodita Xiomara, on beh Perez and Erodita Xiomara Perez Salguero
Defendant:
CM Enterprises of Rockland Inc (dba Luigi O'Gradys Deli and Catering), Michelle Worab, Michelle, in her individual capacity Woreb and others
Gutierrez-Cruz v. Garland
as 21-60909
Petitioner:
Xiomara Elizabeth Gutierrez-Cruz
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
