Cases 51 - 60 of 1,203
Baker et al v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company et al
as 4:2021cv00064
Plaintiff:
Biff Baker Fence Incorporated, Robert Baker and William J Baker
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Dennis McEvoy, Jane Doe McEvoy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Doe BP v. Tempe, City of et al
as 2:2021cv00184
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Kelly Michelson, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe BP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Carisle et al
as 2:2021cv00137
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Kevin Carisle and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Doe v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv00132
Plaintiff:
Unknown Party and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Katrina Kane, Oscar Cortez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Franson et al v. Dwyer et al
as 4:2021cv00025
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs, John Doe Dwyer, Lisha Dwyer and others
Plaintiff:
Deanna Franson and Cindy Lynn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Jamie et al v. Parts Authority LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00015
Plaintiff:
Hugo Jamie, Randall Gohn and Robert Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Yaron Rosenthal, Larry Browne, BBB Logistics Incorporated doing business as Diligent Delivery Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Trujillo et al v. Christ et al
as 4:2020cv00484
Defendant:
Cara M Christ, Krystal Colburn and Thomas Salow
Plaintiff:
Susan Doe, Megan Roe and Lizette Trujillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Arizona Board of Regents v. Doe et al
as 2:2020cv01638
Defendant:
John Doe, Facebook Incorporated and asu
Plaintiff:
Arizona Board of Regents
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
