Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 205,986
Roldan v. Nassau County Correction Center et al
as 2:2024cv04167
Plaintiff: Roberto Roldan
Defendant: Nassau County Correction Center, Sheriff James E. Dzurenda and Corrections Officers John Does 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KHEOP v. USA
as 1:2024cv00911
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ABDULLAH KHEOP, Michael Cosby and Michael E. Johnson
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Justise v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00477
Petitioner: Charles E Justise, Sr
Respondent: Warden
Not Yet Classified: INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bankston v. Rocket Mortgage, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01679
Plaintiff: Lavonne E. Bankston
Defendant: Rocket Mortgage, LLC, Amrock, LLC and WFG National Title Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Davis v. Warren et al
as 6:2024cv00207
Plaintiff: Daryl L. Davis
Defendant: Don Warren, Shirley McKellar, Deborah Pullum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
e-Beacon LLC v. ADT LLC
as 2:2024cv00436
Plaintiff: e-Beacon LLC
Defendant: ADT LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
e-Beacon LLC v. Apple Inc.
as 6:2024cv00314
Plaintiff: e-Beacon LLC
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Maylette E. Brown v. O Malley
as 5:2024cv01201
Plaintiff: Maylette E. Brown
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Paris v. Lamar et al
as 3:2024cv00590
Plaintiff: Evans Demetrius Paris
Defendant: Lawlson Lamar, Sarah Freeman, Dorothy Sedgwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01469
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?