Cases 51 - 60 of 263
Burchfield v. Brooks et al
as 3:2021cv00040
Defendant:
Sgt Stergil, Lt. Berry, Lt. Josh and others
Plaintiff:
Sam Burchfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv00260
Defendant:
Officer Pronek, Officer Maldonado, City of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
Pharrish Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00194
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00039
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Loza et al v. Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group, LLC
as 1:2020cv21114
Defendant:
Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group, LLC and Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group, LLC doing business as Epic Hotel
Plaintiff:
Loza, Wilda Loza, Felix Roberto Romano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Nurvarit Vieyra Carrillo, et al v. Robert Wilkinson
as 21-70380
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL VIEYRA CARRILLO, AXEL EDUARDO LOZA VIEYRA, NURVARIT VIEYRA CARRILLO and others
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General
LOZA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv02156
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
Plaintiff:
SANDRA LOZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv02319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Wagner v. Loza et al
as 3:2020cv00430
Defendant:
Tammy Reagan and Rusty Loza
Plaintiff:
Lester Wagner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tutle et al v. AmGuard Insurance Company
as 4:2020cv01118
Defendant:
AmGuard Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
M. Loza Rene, Gary Tutle and Rene M. Loza
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
