Cases 51 - 60 of 106
Carey v. Richardson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00206
Plaintiff:
Carlos Carey
Defendant:
Sergeant Richardson, Phyllis Billups, Billy Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Social Secuirty Administration, Commissioner
as 3:2015cv00505
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey K Sharp
Defendant:
Social Secuirty Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Carey v. Logan et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00193
Plaintiff:
Carlos Carey
Defendant:
Captain Logan and Billy Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Sharp et al
as 2:2015cv00384
Petitioner:
Kenneth Eugene Smith
Respondent:
William G. Sharp, Jr. and Luther Strange
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Corp.
as 1:2015cv00114
Plaintiff:
Mary Johnson , Karen Allen , Kathlene Cantu and others
Defendant:
Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharpe v. Carter et al
as 5:2015cv00033
Plaintiff:
Joe Anthony Sharpe
Defendant:
Betina Carter and Clyde Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian et al v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp
as 4:2014cv02168
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Christian , Jo Blackwelder , Shelly Burns and others
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hampton v. Alexander et al
as 5:2014cv01170
Plaintiff:
Don Michael Hampton
Defendant:
Wayne K Alexander, Jr, Decatur, City of and Jonathan Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Golomb v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00599
Plaintiff:
Phillip N. Golomb
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. , Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. , Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spencer v. Bentley et al
as 7:2014cv00693
Plaintiff:
James Edward Spencer
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, McCall and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
