Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Stinson v. The City of New York
as 12-3069
Petitioner:
The City of New York and Raymond W. Kelly, Commissioner of the New York Police Department, Individually
Plaintiff - Respondent:
Sharif Stinson, On behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Gary Shaw, On behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Jamel Towe, On behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
John Does, P.O.s #1-50 Individually and in their official capacities (the name John Doe being fictitious as the true names are presently unknown)
KELLER v. THE HOME DEPOT et al
as 2:2012cv00550
Plaintiff:
DANIELA KELLER
Defendant:
THE HOME DEPOT and BRIAN MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
AKH Company Inc v. Morris Tire Services Inc et al
as 8:2011cv01903
Plaintiff:
AKH Company Inc
Defendant:
Does, Brian Morris, Tracy Morris and others
Sekerke v. Morris et al
as 3:2011cv01912
Plaintiff:
Keith Wayne Sekerke
Defendant:
Brian Morris, K Everett, D R Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Federal, State and Local Corpora Ficta Employees et al
as 2:2011ms00056
Defendant:
1983; Camden Easterling, Mark Astle, Steven C. Babcock and others
Plaintiff:
Love Thomas Wright Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooper v. Federal, State and Local Corpora Ficta Employees et al
as 2:2011cv00949
Defendant:
1983; Camden Easterling, Mark Astle, Steven C. Babcock and others
Plaintiff:
Love Thomas Wright Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MORRIS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv02351
Plaintiff:
BRIAN MORRIS
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MORRIS V OOC
as 09-6001
Petitioner:
Brian Morris
Office Of Compliance:
Respondent:
Office of Compliance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
