Cases 51 - 60 of 382
In re: Brandon Edwards
as 23-12055
Petitioner:
In re: BRANDON LEE EDWARDS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Etienne v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Respondent:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Petitioner:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
Reserve at Carrington Place
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Brown v. Whitten
as 4:2023cv00128
Petitioner:
Brandon Lee Brown
Respondent:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GOMEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11474
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LEE GOMEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mojica v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2023cv00233
Petitioner:
Brandon Lee Mojica
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Windmill Distributing Company, L.P. v. Jaigobind et al
as 2:2023cv01407
Plaintiff:
Windmill Distributing Company, L.P.
Defendant:
Shalini Jaigobind, Prabhacoomarie Arjoon, Jean Chowlan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
WADE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08454
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LEE WADE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lawson v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Lawson
Defendant:
Pima, County of, Pima County Sheriff's Department, Chris Nanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Garza
Defendant:
State of Nevada, William Williams, C/O Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCOY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06453
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LEE MCCOY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
