Cases 51 - 60 of 85
Bernard v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv00254
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Christopher Simmons v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, et al
as 14-6416
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD SIMMONS, Injured Party
Defendant - Appellee:
BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP and NATIONWIDE TRUSTEE SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1 THROUGH 10, Inclusive
Torns v. Johnson et al
as 3:2014cv00649
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Torns
Defendant:
Harvey Johnson, Jr., City of Jackson, City of Jackson, Mississippi Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. USA
as 1:2014cv01024
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher Bernard King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Simmons v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
as 3:2014cv00761
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Simmons
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP , Nationwide Trustee Services, Inc. and John Doe 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bernard v. Zon et al
as 1:2014cv00651
Plaintiff:
Damien Christopher Bernard
Defendant:
Layla H. Zon and Melodee Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Beam et al
as 3:2013cv00130
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Morgan
Defendant:
Wendall Beam, Smith and Phillips
Christopher Bernard Yancy v. J Soto
as 2:2013cv05545
Respondent:
Warden J Soto
Petitioner:
Christopher Bernard Yancy
Christopher Simmons v. Federal National Mortgage Ass, et al
as 13-5791
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD SIMMONS, Injured Party
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, ET AL., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. ET AL., FANNIE MAE REMIC TRUST 2006-69 and others
Torns v. Majestic Burger's Company, Restaurants Incorporations et al
as 3:2013cv00272
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Torns
Defendant:
Majestic Burger's Company, Restaurants Incorporations , Arlene Caviness, John and Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
