Cases 51 - 60 of 61
ConnectU LLC v. Zuckerberg et al
as 5:2007mc80058
Defendant:
Eduardo Saverin, Mark Zuckerberg, Christopher Hughes and others
Petitioner:
James W. Breyer
Plaintiff:
ConnectU LLC
ConnectU LLC v. Zuckerberg et al
as 5:2007mc80056
Defendant:
Eduardo Saverin, Mark Zuckerberg, Christopher Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
ConnectU LLC
Petitioner:
Greylock Partners
ConnectU LLC v. Zuckerberg et al
as 5:2007mc80057
Defendant:
Eduardo Saverin, Mark Zuckerberg, Christopher Hughes and others
Petitioner:
Meritech Capital Partners
Plaintiff:
ConnectU LLC
ConnectU LLC v. Zuckerberg et al
as 5:2007mc80055
Defendant:
Eduardo Saverin, Mark Zuckerberg, Christopher Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
ConnectU LLC
Petitioner:
Accel Partners
Hughes v. Haney
as 6:2008cv00219
Petitioner:
Christopher Hughes
Respondent:
Steve . Haney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Connectu LLC et al v. Zuckerberg et al
as 2:2006cv01640
In Re:
John Taves and Pacific Northwest Software
Counter Defendant:
Cameron Winklevoss, Divya Narendra and Tyler Winklevoss
Defendant:
Eduardo Saverin, Mark Zuckerberg, Christopher Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Connectu LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wood et al v. City of Elgin
as 1:2007cv05418
Plaintiff:
William F. Wood, JR., Lance Adams, III, Jennifer L. Ahrens and others
Defendant:
City of Elgin and City of Elgin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hughes v. Widup et al
as 2:2007cv00290
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hughes
Defendant:
John J Widup and US Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ConnectU LLC v. Zuckerberg, et al
as 07-1796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONNECTU LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK ZUCKERBERG, EDUARDO SAVERIN, DUSTIN MOSKOVITZ and others
Defendant:
CAMERON WINKLEVOSS, TYLER WINKLEVOSS and DIVYA NARENDRA
:
, and
ConnectU LLC v. Zuckerberg et al
as 3:2007mc80056
Plaintiff:
ConnectU LLC, ConnectU LLC and ConnectU LLC
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg, Mark Zuckerberg, Mark Zuckerberg and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
