Cases 51 - 60 of 482
US v. Cromwell
as 23-1138
Cross Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
CEDRIC CROMWELL
Interested Party:
CARLTON HENDRICKS, Enrolled Member of the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe and MASHPEE WAMPANOAG INDIAN TRIBE
Cromwell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Cromwell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
US v. Cromwell
as 23-1116
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
CEDRIC CROMWELL
Interested Party:
CARLTON HENDRICKS, Enrolled Member of the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe and MASHPEE WAMPANOAG INDIAN TRIBE
Stryker v. Cromwell
as 2:2023cv00139
Petitioner:
Robert C Stryker
Respondent:
Warden Daniel Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aldabe v. Sullivan & Cromwell LLP et al
as 1:2023cv00850
Plaintiff:
Fermin Aldabe
Defendant:
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, James L Bromley and Fabio Weinberg Crocco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 fr Notice of Removal - Fraud
Lund v. Cromwell
as 2:2023cv00090
Petitioner:
Todd M Lund
Respondent:
Warden Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson, Mark v. Cromwell, Daniel M.
as 3:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Mark Nelson
Defendant:
Daniel M. Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCauley, Terrance v. Cromwell, Daniel
as 3:2023cv00026
Petitioner:
Terrance A. McCauley and Terrance Arnez McCauley-Bey
Respondent:
Daniel Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrett v. Cromwell
as 2:2023cv00031
Petitioner:
Leon Garrett, Jr
Respondent:
Warden Daniel Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
